Description: Systematic review of Randomised Control Trials. The objective of the review was to evaluate the effectiveness of work‐ and person‐directed interventions compared to no intervention or alternative interventions in preventing stress at work in healthcare workers.
Authors' conclusions
There is low‐quality evidence that CBT and mental and physical relaxation reduce stress more than no intervention but not more than alternative interventions. There is also low‐quality evidence that changing work schedules may lead to a reduction of stress. Other organisational interventions have no effect on stress levels. More randomised controlled trials are needed with at least 120 participants that compare the intervention to a placebo‐like intervention. Organisational interventions need better focus on reduction of specific stressors.
What's the evidence base for this resource: As this is a Cochrane Systematic Review, it is considered to be of the highest standard of evidence.
Potential uses and limitation: Discusses the findings of evaluations studies of a range of stress-prevention interventions in health-oriented workplaces, from individual level to organisational level. You can follow up by finding the original studies of interventions that may be relevant for your workplace if required.
Where it comes from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub5/full
Ruotsalainen, J. H., Verbeek, J. H., Mariné, A., & Serra, C. (2014). Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11).
This resource is tagged with the following. Clicking on a tag will direct you to all resources with that tag
Employee Empowerment and Work Environment Staff Health and Wellness